April 23, 2020 7:15 PM PDT
How? Literally the entire point of [url=https://www.rsgoldfast.com/]RS gold[/url] Dungeoneering is to get your stats up enough to clear rooms/content/enemies/bosses in the floors, craft better things to work with, etc., so if you set together with different irons, then that defeats the entire purpose of Dungeoneering, also I 10000% guarantee you people will only get high level irons to carry them through every thing and craft gear for them like in ordinary DG. Group iron DG needs not to happen. Also Group Ironman manner generally needs not to happen, it is a bad idea by people who don't have any idea about how it's going to perform or how it's going to impact anything, and it's a huge waste of dev time required everywhere. Endgame PvM is not the same story.
Some really high dungeoneering exp fitting for such a high level dungeon, although I have mentioned earlier, the ideal situation for dg would have been if dungeons that were elite had been high-difficulty dungeons, with the very same drops as now reduced combat exp. Would make dungeoneering more diverse rather than being daemonheim flooring repeatedly from 1-120 (that is what people always bring up if complaining about how much a minigame skill dg is).But naturally, pvmers mad, can't lock supervisors behind a service skill (what is magister again?), and others angry since it might make farming have an dg req from getting maximum combat in a week on a level 3, also it would keep them.
Daily challenges utilized to take part in this too, but it has been fixed. Jagex stated in the past that they were looking at dailyscape reductions, particularly as it is another example of a D&D that's the training method for a 35, looking at caches. Looking at approaches to [url=https://www.rsgoldfast.com/RS2007.Gold]buy old school runescape gold[/url] nerf it award it bonus XP instead of XP. Something should be performed to sinkholes, even though it's been years when Jagex came up with this thought and with no actions.
How? Literally the entire point of [url=https://www.rsgoldfast.com/]RS gold[/url] Dungeoneering is to get your stats up enough to clear rooms/content/enemies/bosses in the floors, craft better things to work with, etc., so if you set together with different irons, then that defeats the entire purpose of Dungeoneering, also I 10000% guarantee you people will only get high level irons to carry them through every thing and craft gear for them like in ordinary DG. Group iron DG needs not to happen. Also Group Ironman manner generally needs not to happen, it is a bad idea by people who don't have any idea about how it's going to perform or how it's going to impact anything, and it's a huge waste of dev time required everywhere. Endgame PvM is not the same story.
Some really high dungeoneering exp fitting for such a high level dungeon, although I have mentioned earlier, the ideal situation for dg would have been if dungeons that were elite had been high-difficulty dungeons, with the very same drops as now reduced combat exp. Would make dungeoneering more diverse rather than being daemonheim flooring repeatedly from 1-120 (that is what people always bring up if complaining about how much a minigame skill dg is).But naturally, pvmers mad, can't lock supervisors behind a service skill (what is magister again?), and others angry since it might make farming have an dg req from getting maximum combat in a week on a level 3, also it would keep them.
Daily challenges utilized to take part in this too, but it has been fixed. Jagex stated in the past that they were looking at dailyscape reductions, particularly as it is another example of a D&D that's the training method for a 35, looking at caches. Looking at approaches to [url=https://www.rsgoldfast.com/RS2007.Gold]buy old school runescape gold[/url] nerf it award it bonus XP instead of XP. Something should be performed to sinkholes, even though it's been years when Jagex came up with this thought and with no actions.